The Scizer results you’ll see in this article aren’t renders, stock photos, or cases from other countries. They’re real patients treated at my clinic in Bogotá during 2023 and 2024, with documented measurements, photographs under controlled conditions, and verifiable follow-up. Documenting Scizer before and after rigorously isn’t just transparency: it’s the only way for you to realistically evaluate if this treatment can give you the results you’re looking for. Over the past two years I’ve treated more than 320 cases with Scizer, with a 94% satisfaction rate and average reductions of 8-12 centimeters in abdomen when completing the 2-session protocol spaced each month. Below I’ll show you 6 representative cases with all the information: patient profile, treated area, number of sessions, exact measurements and timeline of changes.
If you’re tired of seeing obviously manipulated “before and after” photos on social media, here you’ll find real documentation with verifiable numbers.
How to Interpret Scizer Photos Correctly
Before showing you the cases, you need to know how to identify legitimate vs manipulated photos.
Professional photography conditions: Same controlled lighting in all shots. Same calibrated camera distance. Same body posture without intentional abdominal contraction. Same time of day (important because natural inflammation varies). Recognizable and consistent clinic background.
What to look for in legitimate photos: Same moles, marks or visible tattoos as reference. Continuity in underwear used. Date metadata when available. Most important: numerical measurements with tape measure taken at the same anatomical points.
Red flags of fake photos: Drastically different lighting between “before” and “after” (hard vs soft light works miracles). Different pose (relaxed abdomen in “before” vs contracted in “after”). Obvious Photoshop in contours or skin. No numerical measurements. Only favorable angle in “after”, unfavorable angle in “before”.
All photos you’ll see include tape measure measurements. Centimeters don’t lie. A “before” of 94 cm and an “after” of 85.5 cm is a real difference of 8.5 cm, period.
Case 1: Post-pregnancy Abdomen
Profile: Woman, 34 years, 2 pregnancies (last 18 months ago), initial BMI 26.8.
Treated area: Scizer abdomen complete (12 squares distributed in lower, middle abdomen and flanks).
Objective: Reduce post-partum “belly” resistant to regular exercise (does Pilates 3 times/week for 8 months without improvement in that specific zone).
Documented Measurements
| Measurement Point | Before | After 2 Sessions | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contour at navel level | 94 cm | 85.5 cm | -8.5 cm |
| Waist contour | 82 cm | 76 cm | -6 cm |
| Lower abdomen pinch | 4.8 cm | 2.2 cm | -54% |
| Body weight | 68 kg | 65.5 kg | -2.5 kg |
Results Timeline
Session 1 (day 0): Application in lower and middle abdomen. Tolerable heat sensation. Left clinic without discomfort.
Week 1: Mild reduction in swelling. Reduction of 1.5 cm in contour. “I don’t see big difference yet.”
Week 2: More noticeable reduction. 3 cm less. “My exercise pants fit differently, less tight at waist.”
Session 2 (week 4): Second application completing protocol. Intermediate measurement: 89 cm (5 cm less than initial).
Week 6: Clear reduction. 7 cm less. “Other people start commenting I look thinner.”
Week 8 (final result): 8.5 cm total reduction. Skin visibly firmer. “I wear clothing I had stored for 4 years.”
Testimonial
“After two C-sections, I thought I’d never recover my abdomen without surgery. It wasn’t instant magic, it was 2 sessions over 2 months, but now I have the abdomen I had before getting pregnant. The best part is the skin didn’t get lax as I feared, on the contrary, it looks tighter.”
Photos: Three shots (before, after session 1, final result). Same lighting, same posture, tape measure visible in each photo showing measurements.
Case 2: Male Flanks Resistant
Profile: Man, 41 years, regular athlete (runs 15-20 km/week), initial BMI 27.2.
Treated area: Bilateral flanks (“love handles”).
Objective: Eliminate lateral accumulation that persists despite constant cardiovascular exercise and controlled nutrition.
Documented Measurements
| Measurement Point | Before | After 2 Sessions | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Contour at flank level | 98 cm | 91 cm | -7 cm |
| Right flank pinch | 4.2 cm | 2.0 cm | -52% |
| Left flank pinch | 4.4 cm | 2.1 cm | -52% |
Clinical Observations
Male flanks respond excellently to Scizer because the fat here is relatively superficial and localized (typical android distribution). This patient saw especially fast changes: noticeable reduction from the third week.
In active men, flank fat tends to be “newer” (accumulated in last 5-10 years) vs older visceral fat more difficult to mobilize. This explains the speed of response.
Testimonial
“I’ve been running marathons for years but these ‘spare tires’ wouldn’t go away no matter what. With Scizer they disappeared in 8 weeks. Now my tight shirts fit as they should, without that lateral bulge I hated. Worth every peso invested.”
Side photo: Clearly shows reduction of lateral contour. The profile changed visibly. Side angle is the most honest for evaluating flanks.
Case 3: Female Inner Thighs
Profile: Woman, 29 years, active (yoga 4 times/week), initial BMI 24.1.
Treated area: Bilateral inner thighs (area difficult to treat with conventional exercise).
Objective: Eliminate thigh chafing when walking, create small space (moderate “thigh gap”, not extreme).
Documented Measurements
| Measurement Point | Before | After 2 Sessions | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right thigh circumference (15 cm below groin) | 58 cm | 54 cm | -4 cm |
| Left thigh circumference | 58.5 cm | 54.5 cm | -4 cm |
| Gap between thighs (standing) | 0 cm (contact) | 2.5 cm | Gap created |
Clinical Observations
Inner thighs are more challenging area because the fat is diffuse and deep. The protocol requires careful distribution of the 12 squares to cover the entire inner thigh extension.
This patient first noticed improvement in skin texture (less visible cellulite) thanks to the radiofrequency component, then gradual contour reduction. The goal wasn’t extreme model “thigh gap” but eliminating chafing discomfort. We achieved it completely.
Testimonial
“My thighs don’t chafe when I walk anymore. Seems simple but it changed my daily life: I can wear dresses without shorts underneath for the first time in years, walk without irritation, wear skirts with confidence. I recovered comfort I hadn’t had since adolescence.”
Case 4: Male Abdomen + Flanks Combined
Profile: Man, 48 years, executive with sedentary lifestyle until 1 year ago (started healthy regimen), initial BMI 29.5.
Treated area: Complete abdomen + flanks (strategic distribution of 12 squares per session).
Objective: Recover pre-pandemic silhouette. Gained 12 kg working from home during 2020-2021.
Documented Measurements
| Measurement Point | Before | After 2 Sessions | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abdomen contour (navel) | 106 cm | 95 cm | -11 cm |
| Flank contour | 102 cm | 94 cm | -8 cm |
| Body weight | 89 kg | 85 kg | -4 kg |
Clinical Observations
This patient is perfect example of Scizer as complement to healthy habits, not substitute. He had lost 4 kg with diet and exercise in 6 months before coming to consultation, but the “belly” persisted disproportionately.
With Scizer he accelerated the remodeling process in those resistant areas. During treatment he continued his regimen: walking 10,000 steps daily, controlled nutrition (moderate caloric deficit of 300-400 calories/day).
Important to clarify: Scizer doesn’t work miracles in sedentary people who eat poorly. This patient committed to maintaining his habits. The combination of Scizer + improved lifestyle produced this result.
Testimonial
“I had ‘office belly’ at 48 years. Scizer helped me but didn’t save me from doing my part. I walked religiously, ate better, and the treatment accelerated what with diet alone would have taken me another year. Now I wear the clothing I wore at 40.”
Case 5: Female Arms Post-Weight Loss
Profile: Woman, 52 years, lost 15 kg through diet in last 18 months, initial BMI 25.8.
Treated area: Bilateral upper arms (triceps posterior zone, “bat wings”).
Objective: Reduce laxity and residual fat that persists after successful weight loss.
Documented Measurements
| Measurement Point | Before | After 2 Sessions | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Right arm circumference (midpoint) | 32 cm | 28.5 cm | -3.5 cm |
| Left arm circumference | 32.5 cm | 29 cm | -3.5 cm |
| Right triceps pinch | 2.8 cm | 1.3 cm | -54% |
Clinical Observations
Arms require careful protocol because the skin here is thinner and more delicate. The combination of fat reduction + radiofrequency tightening effect works especially well for this common post-weight loss problem.
This patient had managed to lose 15 kg with considerable effort, but her arms maintained that frustrating laxity that prevented her from wearing sleeveless blouses. With Scizer we achieved two objectives: reduce the residual fat deposit AND notably improve skin firmness.
Testimonial
“I lost 15 kilos with sacrifice but my arms still had that laxity that made me look older. I didn’t want surgery with scars. Scizer not only slimmed them, it made them firmer. I went back to wearing sleeveless blouses for the first time in 10 years.”
Case 6: Lower Back (“Bra Bulges”)
Profile: Woman, 38 years, stable weight, BMI 26.2, no recent fluctuations.
Treated area: Lower back, subscapular region (where bra marks).
Objective: Eliminate “bulges” that protrude with tight clothing, especially with bras or sports tops.
Documented Measurements
| Measurement Point | Before | After 2 Sessions | Reduction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Back contour (bra line) | 87 cm | 82 cm | -5 cm |
| Right back pinch | 3.2 cm | 1.5 cm | -53% |
| Left back pinch | 3.4 cm | 1.6 cm | -53% |
Clinical Observations
The back is an “invisible” zone for oneself but very visible to others and in photographs. This accumulation at the bra line is extremely common and frustrating because it’s very resistant to conventional exercise.
Responds excellently to Scizer because the fat here is superficial and localized. In this case, 2 sessions were sufficient to completely eliminate the problem. The patient noticed her clothing fit better from the third week after the first session.
Testimonial
“I couldn’t wear tight blouses because those back ‘bulges’ would show. It was uncomfortable and made me feel disproportionate. With Scizer they disappeared completely. Now I wear whatever I want without worrying about how it looks from behind.”
What to Expect Per Session: Realistic Timeline
Session 1: The Measured Beginning
Typical reduction: 2-3 cm Visible change: Mild reduction in swelling Sensation: Skin slightly tighter Reality: Don’t expect dramatic transformation yet
The first session establishes the foundation. It destroys fat cells that your body will eliminate progressively. It’s normal to feel “is this all?” after the first session. The real results come in the following weeks.
Week 2-3: First Noticeable Changes
Accumulated reduction: 3-5 cm from session 1 Visible change: Clothing fits differently Key moment: Most patients get excited here Sensation: Motivation to continue
This is the moment where you see it’s really working. Your favorite pants fit less tight. You look in the mirror and notice real difference.
Session 2 (week 4): Consolidation
Application: Second complete session Accumulated reduction: 5-7 cm Objective: Maximize and stabilize result
The second session doesn’t start from zero. It builds on the progress of the first, attacking areas that need additional reinforcement.
Week 6-8: Final Result
Total reduction: 8-12 cm (depending on area and case) Visible change: Clear transformation Tightening effect: Skin notably firmer Duration: Stabilized permanent result with stable weight
This is your final result. The new collagen is completely formed. The destroyed fat is completely eliminated. What you see in week 8 is what you’ll maintain with reasonable habits.
Learn more details about how Scizer works and its mechanism of action.
Factors That Affect Scizer Results
Initial adipose tissue thickness: More fat = potentially more sessions needed (although our standard protocol is 2). Pinch >5 cm is substantial fat. Pinch <3 cm responds very fast.
Age and skin elasticity: Under 40 with young skin: excellent skin recovery. Between 40-55: good results with radiofrequency tightening component. Over 55: positive results but may need adjusted expectations in elasticity.
Compliance with post-session recommendations: Adequate hydration (2-3 liters water/day) accelerates fat elimination. Avoiding alcohol 48h post-session allows optimal process. Walking 20-30 min daily helps lymphatic drainage.
Eating habits during treatment: Moderate caloric deficit (200-400 calories/day less) enhances results. Caloric excess (+500 calories/day) can partially neutralize effect. You don’t need extreme diet, just awareness.
Regular physical activity: Exercise accelerates elimination of destroyed fat through better lymphatic circulation. Walking 30-40 min daily is sufficient. You don’t need to be an athlete, just move regularly.
Genetics and fat distribution: Subcutaneous fat (what you can pinch) responds excellently. Internal visceral fat (the hard kind you can’t pinch) does NOT respond. Gynoid distribution (hips/thighs) vs android (abdomen/flanks) affects speed but both respond well.
Brutal honesty: If you continue eating 3000-4000 calories daily and completely sedentary life, Scizer results will be temporary. The treatment destroys existing fat cells, but doesn’t prevent the remaining ones from growing with chronic caloric excess. You need minimally reasonable habits.
Patient Satisfaction Assessment
Overall rating: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ 4.8/5.0 (based on 156 patients treated 2023-2024)
| Evaluation Criterion | Average Rating | Most Frequent Comment |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment effectiveness | 4.9/5.0 | “Worked better than expected” |
| Speed of results | 4.8/5.0 | “Saw changes in 2 weeks” |
| Comfort during session | 4.6/5.0 | “Tolerable heat, no pain” |
| Absence of downtime | 5.0/5.0 | “Returned to work immediately” |
| Improvement in skin quality | 4.7/5.0 | “Firmer skin, not just less fat” |
| Price-result ratio | 4.5/5.0 | “Investment worth it” |
Analysis of lowest rating (4.5 in price-result): Reflects that Scizer requires significant investment ($1.8M for complete protocol). However, 92% rated this ratio as “excellent” or “good”. The 8% who gave low rating expected results with less investment or had unrealistic expectations from the start.
This reinforces the importance of clear communication in initial assessment about required investment and realistically expected results.
Conclusion: Realistic Results with Real Commitment
The Scizer before and after photos you’ve seen aren’t miracles nor digital manipulation: they’re results from real patients who:
- Completed the protocol: 2 sessions spaced each month (didn’t abandon halfway)
- Maintained reasonable habits: Balanced nutrition without extreme excesses
- Stayed minimally active: Walking counts as valid exercise
- Had realistic expectations: Knew they’d see significant reduction, not instant magical transformation
If you meet these four points, the Scizer results you saw are achievable for you too. Not in the exact same timeline (each body responds differently), but in the same effectiveness range: 8-12 cm reduction in abdomen, 5-7 cm in flanks, 3-5 cm per thigh.
The question isn’t whether Scizer works. The photographic evidence and measurements demonstrate it does. The question is: are you ready to commit to the complete 2-session protocol?
Schedule your no-cost assessment where I’ll perform:
- Tape measurements in your problem areas
- Body composition analysis
- Initial reference photo (same we’ll use for “after”)
- Personalized protocol with realistic result projection
- Transparent total investment: check current prices
No commitment. No pressure. Only honest information about whether Scizer is right for you and what results you can realistically expect according to your specific measurements.
| [Schedule Assessment] | See Complete Scizer Treatment | Compare Scizer vs Cryolipolysis |
Graphics credits, references and sources
- Improved methods for evaluating pre-clinical and histological effects of subcutaneous fat reduction using high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in a porcine model — dispositivo Scizer (Classys Inc., Seúl)
- Warner-Palacio J., et al. Investigating the Metabolic Effects of Ultrasound-Induced Lipolysis — revisión sobre el uso de ultrasonido terapéutico para reducción de grasa localizada